Label Bias in Machine Learning

Understanding Label Bias

Supervised learning is built on the assumption that training datasets accurately represent the environments in which models will operate. However, this assumption must often be revised, particularly in fairness-critical applications. Challenges arise when data scientists must select appropriate labels, as cultural, contextual, or individual differences can lead to inconsistencies or oversimplifications in labelling. These oversights can fail to capture meaningful distinctions between classes, creating a pathway for label bias.

Label bias refers to distortions introduced during the labelling process, often stemming from systemic discrimination, inaccuracies, or ambiguities. These issues cause the training data to diverge from the underlying distribution, compromising model fairness and performance. Addressing label bias is essential to ensure equitable and effective machine learning outcomes.

 

Example for Label Bias in Machine Learning

Consider a scenario where images are labelled as “wedding.” People familiar with Western culture may label only pictures featuring brides in white dresses and grooms in dark suits as “wedding.” However, images of Indian weddings, characterized by colourful attire and distinctive decorations, might not be recognized as weddings by the same individual. This reflects label bias, where cultural context influences labelling, resulting in underrepresentation or misclassification of certain groups or scenarios. (Fahse et al., 2021).

 

Design Approach for Mitigating Label Bias in ML

Tackling labelling bias requires a systematic, proactive approach. You can get started with these resources:  

Free Resources for Aggregation Bias Mitigation

Best Practice for Aggregation Bias from problem definition to model deployment (click Free Downloads).

 
 
AI Bias Mitigation Package – £999

The ultimate resource for organisations ready to tackle bias at scale starting from problem definition through to model monitoring to drive responsible AI practices.

dribbble, logo, media, social Mitigate and resolve 15 Types of Bias specific to your project with detailed guidance from problem definition to model monitoring.
dribbble, logo, media, social Packed with practical methods, research-based strategies, and critical questions to guide your team.
dribbble, logo, media, social Comprehensive checklists with +75 design cards for every phase in the AI/ ML pipeline
Get Bias Mitigation Package– (Delivery within 2-3 days)
Customised AI Bias Mitigation Package – £2499
We’ll customise the design cards and checklists to meet your specific use case and compliance requirements—ensuring the toolkit aligns perfectly with your goals and industry standards.
dribbble, logo, media, social Mitigate and resolve 15 Types of Bias specific to your project with detailed guidance from problem definition to model monitoring.
dribbble, logo, media, social Packed with practical methods, research-based strategies, and critical questions specific to your use case.
dribbble, logo, media, social Customised checklists and +75 design cards for every phase in the AI/ ML pipeline
Get Customised AI Bias Mitigation Package– (Delivery within 7 days)

 

Summary

This guidance emphasizes that label bias in machine learning models can be effectively mitigated through thoughtful design approaches and practical debiasing strategies. By identifying and addressing label bias early in the development process, stakeholders can take proactive steps to ensure the accuracy and fairness of the models. While proxy labels can often mask fairness violations, strategies like data re-weighting, fairness constraints, and iterative refinement of surrogates offer viable pathways to counteract bias, even when the true labels are difficult to observe.

Collaboration across teams—data scientists, domain experts, and decision-makers—is essential in ensuring that fairness remains a priority throughout the entire machine learning lifecycle. By adopting these design approaches and debiasing strategies, stakeholders can contribute to creating models that are not only accurate but also fair, reducing the risk of harm and increasing the trust placed in AI systems.

 

Sources

Fahse, T., Huber, V. and van Giffen, B., 2021. Managing bias in machine learning projects. In Innovation Through Information Systems: Volume II: A Collection of Latest Research on Technology Issues (pp. 94-109). Springer International Publishing.

Jiang, H. and Nachum, O., 2020, June. Identifying and correcting label bias in machine learning. In International conference on artificial intelligence and statistics (pp. 702-712). PMLR.

Mhasawade, V., D’Amour, A. and Pfohl, S.R., 2024, June. A Causal Perspective on Label Bias. In The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1282-1294).

Zhang, Y., Li, B., Ling, Z. and Zhou, F., 2024, March. Mitigating label bias in machine learning: Fairness through confident learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 38, No. 15, pp. 16917-16925).

Share:

Related Courses & Al Consulting

Designing Safe, Secure and Trustworthy Al

Workshop for meeting EU AI ACT Compliance for Al

Contact us to discuss your requirements

Related Guidelines

Understanding Aggregation Bias Machine learning plays a more significant role in shaping decisions that directly affect people’s lives, from determining

Understanding Label Bias Supervised learning is built on the assumption that training datasets accurately represent the environments in which models

Understanding Historical Bias A lot of the time algorithms fail even after following systematic processes and best practices for sampling

No data was found

To download the guide, fill it out.